Search For Truth, Not To Defend A Belief

The False Doctrine of the Flat Earth by David Nikao

If you’re a flat earther, have you studied the context of the Bible verses which are being cited to proclaim “the Bible says flat earth”?

This book goes through all 240 verses that people like Nathan Roberts cite, to show you the proper context; because if you’re promoting this list, then you’re accountable for the explanations.

It gives a fresh perspective about the ‘firmament‘ of Genesis; the ‘circle‘ of Isaiah 40:22; the clay turned to the ‘seal‘ in Job 38:13-14; the ‘pillars‘ of 1 Samuel 2:8; the sun going forth in his ‘circuit‘ of Psalms 19:6; and much more.

If you know someone who believes that the Scriptures describes a domed, flat earth; it will help you understand their rationale in citing these verses.

If you’re a believer who’s researching the flat earth, this book is critical for you.

If you believe in the heliocentric universe, have you read what Moses, Job, David, and Isaiah; declared about the earth, the sun, and the stars? The Bible describes a sun that moves in a circuit, which has been stopped, and has been moved back. And it describes an earth that is fixed. The Bible is purely geocentric, and there is no Scriptural justification for the heliocentric model.

The Bible also describes the lower circular layers which hold back the fountains of the deep; the spherical layers of atmosphere around the globe earth; the constellations on the ecliptic which encircles the globe earth; and the celestial sphere of stars which surround the globe earth as a tent, as a tabernacle.

The real deception is the geocentric globe earth universe, which the enemy is hiding with false narratives of the heliocentric universe and the flat earth model.


The stars in the southern hemisphere prove that the earth is a globe.

On the flat earth model, if people in Australia, South Africa and South America, were all facing South, they would be facing opposite directions, so there’s no way that they can all see the south celestial pole star, which does not move.

Yet people in those three Southern Hemisphere continents can look south and see the south celestial pole star, and see the stars circling around it.

On the flat earth model, if people in Australia, South Africa and South America, were all facing South, they would be facing opposite directions. Yet people in those three Southern Hemisphere continents can look South and see the South Celestial Pole star, and see the stars circling around it. This proves that the North and South Pole stars are at the top and bottom of the ball of lights, and the other stars are circling the globe Earth.

This proves that the north and south celestial pole stars are at the top and bottom of the celestial sphere, and the other stars are circling the globe Earth.

Flat-earthers proclaim that this is possible because when people are looking south, they’re seeing a reflection off of the glass dome of the stars in the northern hemisphere.

But that is a false explanation, as the stars in the northern hemisphere are different than the stars in the southern hemisphere. Here are the constellations in the northern hemisphere.

northern hemisphere stars

Here are the constellations in the southern hemisphere.

southern hemisphere stars

Question for flat earthers:  What is the scientific explanation for how the sun changes its path, to move from the larger circle of the Tropic of Capricorn (32,729 mile circumference) to the much smaller circle of the Tropic of Cancer (18,504 mile circumference)?

Question for flat earthers:  The winter solstice was on 12/21, so the sun is circling near the Tropic of Capricorn. What is the scientific explanation for how the sun changes its path, to move from the larger circle of the Tropic of Capricorn (32,729 mile circumference) to the much smaller circle of the Tropic of Cancer (18,504 mile circumference)?

And what is the scientific explanation for how the sun changes speed from 1,322 MPH on the larger circle to 771 MPH on the smaller circle, to complete exactly one revolution per day?
Please comment below.  Thank you!

Note: the numbers for the tropics are based on the supposed flat earth map, not on the globe. The supposed flat earth map is distorted, as it’s a north-polar azimuthal equidistant projection of the globe earth. So though the Tropics on the globe earth have a circumference of 22,847 miles, on the flat earth map they are distorted. Using the equator as a baseline at 24,901 miles in circumference; the numbers of the Tropic of Cancer (18,504 miles) and the Tropic of Capricorn (32,729 miles) are based on the geometry of the azimuthal projection; not the actual globe.

After a lot of research, I believe that the enemy has created a deception regarding the design of the universe.

The Illuminati card game has a Flat Earth card that says “People laugh, but the flat earthers know something”.

What flat earthers know is that the earth isn’t flying through space orbiting the sun.  Astronomers and scientists have not proved that the Earth is moving.

And from our Earthly perspective, the planets and stars appear the same regardless of whether it’s the Copernican heliocentric view or the Tychonic geocentric view.

The deception is that the enemy has caused people to promote the heliocentric view based on philosophy, to not involve a Creator in the explanation of the design of the universe.

And that led to the big bang theory, the theory of evolution, etc.; all of which steals glory from our Creator, and deceives people.

It wasn’t until scientific probes produced data about the radiation of the expanding universe, and the orientation of the quasars and radio galaxies; that researches were able to see that all of those things were pointing back to Earth as the center of the universe.

These findings were published in a book titled ‘Geocentrism 101 – An Introduction into the  Science of  Geocentric Cosmology‘ in 2013, and then explained in a movie called The Principle in late 2014.

Then shortly afterward the flat earth theory was aggressively pushed on YouTube and Facebook, to try to cover over the evidence, and to cause people to dismiss anyone who teaches that the Earth is geocentric.

The enemy has created a false dichotomy, so that the debate is between the geocentric flat earth vs. the heliocentric globe earth; so that people don’t consider the third option, that of the geocentric globe earth.

It puts the Earth at the center of the universe, proving a Designer/Creator, and explains why stars perfectly circle the Earth; while maintaining the laws of physics of the globe earth and the surrounding elaborate universe, which is a precision time-piece.

Please read the geocentric Earth page, to see the scientific research that proves that we are at the center of the universe.

I’m not declaring that the earth is geocentric, as I can’t prove it scientifically; but when you look at how Bible verses seem to point to a geocentric earth, it’s an option that we need to consider. Read through the website, and you decide.

If you’re a flat-earther, you can decide to click away, thinking that you know the truth; but I would hope that your goal is to find the whole truth, not to defend a position.

People like Nathan Roberts and Rob Skiba point to Bible verses which they proclaim prove that the earth is flat; but the verses are taken out of context, and some of them prove that the earth is a globe.

Please read this Biblical Proofs Of The Geocentric Globe Earth study and decide for yourself.

Why would the enemy create the flat earth deception?

Because most flat earthers are sharing truth in other areas, whether it’s about coming out of churchianity, about the Illuminati and their agenda, etc.; so by getting them to believe in the flat earth, they cause family and friends to stop listening to all that they teach.

On this page I will address the major challenges that I’ve found with the flat earth theory, which are explained in more detail on the other pages.

Here’s a video from the Geographic South Pole, looking straight up, which proves that the earth is not flat. 

We can see the perfect circle of stars which is only possible on the globe earth, as no point on the supposed ice ring would show the stars circling overhead.

Here’s a video of a 5-day time-lapse from March 8-13, 2017, taken from the Amundsen–Scott South Pole Station, which proves that the earth is not flat.

Airplane Video Proves Sun Is Not 3,000 Miles Above The Flat Earth

This observation is impossible on a Flat Earth with a Sun 3000 Miles above.  We can clearly see the Sun on the Horizon from 43,000 ft. The clouds beneath us are illuminated from below but are dark on top.

This geometry is impossible on a Flat Earth.  Of course – it works just fine on a Globe.

The Nikon P900 camera debunks the flat earth.

This video shows one ship that is moored near the horizon line, and the distant ship behind it which is well below the horizon; proving the curvature of the earth.

Some flat earthers commented that you should see the distant ship ’tilting’ if the Earth is curved, but the distance equates to only .23 degrees of tilt, which is not perceivable.

Sorry Flat Earthers The Equinox Geometry does NOT work on a Flat Earth.

The Flat Earth fails to explain the real observations we can make on the Equinox twice per year.


A commercial pilot who is based out of Australia, who makes international flights in the southern hemisphere, shows that flat earthers cannot produce a legitimate pilots flight plan.

The video description says: A message to Flat Earthers. If you can’t show me a map that works and you can’t tell me how to navigate precisely around the real Earth you are wasting your time telling me the Earth is Flat. I can and do navigate precisely around the real Earth and I have been doing this safely for over 30 years using the Globe. Time to start producing real results guys. The same old nonsense arguments won’t cut it here any longer.

Flat earthers misrepresent the size of the sun, to proclaim that it gets smaller as it sets.

Flat earthers misrepresent the size of the sun, proclaiming that it is shrinking

Here’s one of Wolfie6020‘s short videos where he used two cameras to record at the same time, one with a solar filter, one without.

This video shows how the size of the sun in the hazy sky changes as the camera automatically adjusts.

Flat earthers tell us to trust our perspective, but when we do that, we see that the sun and moon do not line up with the flat earth theory.

Flat earthers proclaim that the moon is a flat disc, but that simply cannot be true.

This is so easily disproved, that it’s nonsensical for flat earthers to proclaim it.

Flat earthers proclaim that the moon is a flat disc, but that simply cannot be true.

The shadows on the moon prove that it is being illuminated from an external light source.

The sun obviously illuminates the moon, which is contrary to what flat earthers proclaim

Flat earthers cite Genesis 1:16 and say the the world ‘light‘ means that the moon is self-illuminated.

And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also.”

The Hebrew word for ‘light’ points to a luminous body. It does not say that it provides its own illumination.

ma’owr; properly, a luminous body or luminary, i.e. (abstractly) light (as an element): figuratively, brightness, i.e.cheerfulness; specifically, a chandelier:—bright, light.

Of course they have no way to scientifically explain how the moon illuminates itself, like we do for the Sun.

And they cannot explain how the moon changes its illumination so that we see crescent moons and half moons.

It’s impossible for people on the flat earth model to see the same side of the moon.

People in northern and southern hemispheres would see different sides of the flat earth moon

We would see different sides of the moon, on the flat earth model.

The moon can't work properly on the flat earth

The sun and moon do not vanish as a small dot over the horizon; but rather, they rise up from under the horizon and set below the horizon.

On the flat earth, objects that are moving away would simply grow smaller and disappear at the vanishing point, but they would always stay above the horizon.

But every day we see the Sun rise up from under the horizon, and set down below the horizon.

The rising moon proves the globe earth, not the flat earth

The setting sun proves the globe earth not the flat earth

It’s impossible for the sun to rise due East and set due West on the Equinox days.

The sun cannot work properly on the flat earth model.

The sun does not rise and set at the proper locations on the flat earth model.

Australia sun rises due East and sets due West on equinox, disproving flat earth theory

The paths of the 2017 and 2024 solar eclipses across the United States are impossible to explain on the flat earth model.

There is no scientific explanation for the solar eclipse on the flat earth model, and we can clearly see that the path of the eclipse across the United States, cannot match up with the circular path of the flat earth sun.

Here are the 2017 and 2024 eclipse paths overlaid on what people are calling a flat earth map. There is no way to explain how an eclipsed sun, which is circling south of the United States; could create shadows on the United States that curve in the opposite direction.

How do flat earthers scientifically predict upcoming solar and lunar eclipses?

They don’t! There is no scientific data which shows what causes the eclipses (many flat earthers say that the moon doesn’t cause the solar eclipse), and when they will happen.

The Spring and Fall Equinox is a great time to prove whether the earth is flat or a globe.

Geodetic surveying shows that angles of the measured triangle exceed 180 degrees, proving that Earth is curved.  This is called ‘spherical excess’. 

Flat earthers push aside 100’s of years worth of measurements that have been recorded by geodesic surveyors all over the earth.

These surveyors have painstakingly taken measurements from point to point, and using geometry and triangulation, have determined the size of continents, and the shape of the earth.

Triangulation on a flat earth would yield 180 degree sums, but surveyors have found that the sums are greater than 180 degrees, which proves the arc of the earth.  Read Geodesy Proof Of The Flat Earth Deception.

Geodetic surveying reveals that the angles of the measured triangle exceed 180 degrees, proving that the Earth is curved. This is called ‘spherical excess’. If the Earth was flat, the angles would add up to 180 degrees.

One of the biggest perspective problems is that flat earthers are applying the 8″ per mile squared earth curvature formula to wrong line.

The 8″ per mile squared calculation does not measure the curvature of the line of sight, your horizon line; it extends far beyond what you can see.

8 inch per mile squared formula for curved globe earth

One of the biggest perspective problems is that flat earthers are applying the 8" per mile earth curvature formula to wrong line.

Let’s apply this to a picture to see the difference between the level line and the horizon line.

Let's apply this to a picture to see the difference between the level line and the horizon line.

Here is the Earth’s Curve Horizon, Bulge, Drop, and Hidden Calculator, which people use to try to prove that the earth isn’t curved.  This is the default setting of the globe earth with a radius of 3,959 miles, which shows that if your view height is 6 feet, then your horizon line is 3 miles away.  And that’s pretty much what we see in real life.

Curved Earth Pythagorean theorem Formula

Most photos from flat earthers are taken from an elevated position, which extends the horizon line; so just plug the estimated height of the elevated position into the Metabunk Earth’s Curve Formula, and you will see that the horizon line matches up; proving the curved Earth.

Curved Earth Pythagorean theorem Formula viewer height

In the below calculation I used the Advanced option to add 7 zeroes after the planet radius, to mimic a planet that is so big that the flat top is bigger than the supposed flat earth.

And it shows that if your view height is 6 feet, your horizon line is 9,482 miles away.

Curved Earth Pythagorean theorem Formula flat

Now of course your eyes can’t see that far, but a good telescope would be able to see across the flat plain to be able to see that far.

The point is that if the earth really were flat, then you would be able to see much, much further than 3 miles.

Californians should be able to see Hawaii with a telescope, or Mt. McKinley, which is 20,000 feet high.  From atop of Pike Peaks, which is 14,000 feet high, I should be able to use a powerful telescope to see all of America.

But the reason that we can only see to the horizon line is because the earth is curved; you are seeing the bulge of the Earth.

Here is a more technical explanation of the Earth curvature formula, to see how it is being misapplied by flat earthers.

Here is a more technical explanation of the Earth curvature formula, to see how it is being misapplied by flat earthers.

There are a lot of explanations on this website which counter the flat earth explanations, but first let’s set the record straight about the map that most flat-earthers are using.

The map that flat-earthers use actually represents the globe earth!

Before computers, mapping out airplane flight routes was a challenge, as they had to use a globe, or images of the northern and southern hemispheres, like these.

Azimuthal equidistant map globes

To resolve this problem they created the azimuthal equidistant map, which allowed them to see all of the continents on one 2D map.

In order to do this, the bottom half of the globe earth had to be flared out into the outer circles. On the north-polar azimuthal projection map the northern hemisphere is shown in the inner circle, and the southern hemisphere is shown in the flared out circle that surrounds it.

The north-polar equidistant projectionmap is not a flat earth map!

These maps can be centered from anywhere.  If you were planning flights from London, you would center it on London.

North-polar azimuthal projection maps were used during times of war, and the polar route is the shortest distance between countries.

Rendering a globe earth onto a 2D image always cause some distortion.

On the azimuthal projection map, the further away the land mass is from the center point, the greater the distortion.  This is why Australia looks so wide, as it’s been stretched.

Since the continent of Antarctica is opposite of the North Pole on the globe earth, the only way to graphically represent it on the north-polar azimuthal projection map is by turning it inside out, and spreading it out as a white ring on the outside edge.

The South Pole is graphically represented by the outside line of the map.

You can see that the white ring has several bays that match up to the Ross Sea, which is close to New Zealand; and Weddell Sea, which is close to South America.

Below is a south-polar azimuthal equidistant projection map.  You can see that Antarctica and Australia are now normal size, as they are close to the center point; but North America and Euro-Russia are very distorted.  And you can see that the outside edge is blue, because opposite of the South Pole is water on the North Pole.

Antartica south pole azimuthal map proces the flat earth theory is false

Here is a equidistant projection map that is centered on Santiago, Chile.  North and South America are normal size, as is Antarctica, since they are close to the center point; but Euro-Russia is greatly distorted, so much so that it is graphically rendered as a ring around the outside edge (just like the north-polar map).


You can make your own azimuthal equidistant projection maps on this website. You just need to enter the location; such as 90N,0W for the north pole; and 90S, 0W for the south pole.

Here is a Hammond’s north-polar equidistant map for airplane travel, which is the same map that flat earthers use.

It has both sides of the globe represented, which are declaring that it is a projection of the globe earth onto a 2D map. You can clearly see the continent of Antarctica on the bottom of the globes in white.

Hammond's globe map is not a flat earth map

This close-up shows you that the globe declares the continent of Antarctica and the South Pole; and then again on the projection map.  It is declaring that the outside line is the South Pole.  It’s clearly telling you that the continent of Antarctica on the globe earth is represented as the white ring on the projection map.

Hammond's map declares that the ice ring is the continent of Antarctica

On the bottom left of the map is a guide to the distances between meridian (N-S) lines. The distance increases up to the equator, and then decrease at the same rate to the South Pole.  It’s declaring that though on the projection map it appears that the distances are become greater (because the southern hemisphere is flared out so that you can see it on a 2D projection map), that in fact they are getting smaller because the earth is globe-shaped.

Hammonds globe projection map meridian line distances prove that it is not a flat earth map

This Air Map Of The World from 1945 tells the truth, that the north-polar azimuthal equidistant projection represents a globe.

Notice that it doesn’t have an ice wall!  That is because they didn’t include the continent of Antarctica, because it is so greatly distorted.

azimuthal equidistant projection map is not a flat earth map

Here is the call out box on the top right:

This Air Map Of The World from 1945 tells the truth, that the north-polar azimuthal equidistant projection represents a globe.

It says “Since it is impossible to spread the surface of a globe on a flat surface without distortion, all maps are distorted in some respects.  In this map the distortion occurs in the east and west distances.  This distortion increases gradually from the North Pole to the Equator, and then quite rapidly to the outer limits.  The distortion of the Antarctic areas would be so great that these are not shown.”

So they didn’t even include the supposed ‘ice wall’, because it’s not an ice wall; it’s the continent of Antarctica, which is greatly distorted by the algorithm used to make the projection map.  Since Antarctica is opposite of the North Pole on the globe earth, the only way for the program to render it was to stretch it out as a circle.  The outer circle is the South Pole.   The continent has been inverted.

To prove that the supposed ice wall is really the distorted and inverted continent of Antarctica, here is an image that has the outer white ring and the continent of Antarctica.

The image keeps the land mass around the outside edge, and has the continent of Antarctica in the middle, as that is what is on the bottom of the globe.  The land mass is exaggerated, as the outside ring representation is exaggerated.  The continent is inverted to match the inverted outer circle, as the equidistant view is from the top down.

The flat earth map ice ring is actually antarctica

Look at the left side of the continent, which is small compared to the right side.  That matches the thin land mass of the left, compared to the right.

Now look at the peninsula on the left lower side at 240 degrees.  It matches the peninsula on Antarctica.

The top of the circle is very thin and has a recess.

That matches the curvature of the top of Antarctica.

On the bottom right at 110 degrees, there is a small indentation.

That matches the bay on the southeast part of Antarctica.

Let’s take it one step further.  The bottom left red line shows that the meridian lines runs from the bay of Antarctica through South America. The bottom left red lines shows that the meridian line runs from the small bay runs through Asia.  The top red line shows that the meridian line runs from the other large bay in between North America and Russia.

Flat Earth map is equidistant map

The azimuthal equidistant map projection is only a tool, to help determine distances and flight maps on a globe earth.

Every time a flat-earther posts an explanation about direct airplane flights that they say is wrong on a globe earth; they are using this equidistant map, which is a globe map.

Flat earthers take words out of context to say that the Bible declares a flat earth.

They cite the words “pillars of the earth” to proclaim that the flat earth sit on top of pillars.

He raiseth up the poor out of the dust, and lifteth up the beggar from the dunghill, to set them among princes, and to make them inherit the throne of glory: for the pillars of the earth are the LORD’S, and he hath set the world upon them.” 1 Samuel 2:8

Read 1 Samuel 2:2-7, 9-10; you see that the word ‘pillars’ is referring to leaders of the earth, not physical pillars that support the flat earth.

Just like the saying that someone is a ‘pillar in the community’, it is declaring they are a strong leader.

The context is clearly about Elohim raising seemingly lowly people and making them the leaders of the earth.  It is not talking about the design of the physical earth!

Flat earthers say that the ‘circle‘ in Isaiah 40:22 is declaring a flat circle earth.

It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof are as grasshoppers; that stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain, and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in:

Let’s back up to get the context of the verse. Elohim is declaring the glory of His creation.

And to whom would you liken Ěl? And what likeness would you compare to Him? The workman moulds a graven image, and the goldsmith overspreads it with gold, and the silversmith casts silver chains. Isaiah 40:18-19

He is declaring that the works of man are nothing as compared to His creativity and power. Then He points out His Mazzoroth, the twelve signs in the heavenly circle, which have proclaimed His plan of redemption from the beginning.

Did you not know? Have you not heard? Has it not been declared to you from the beginning? Have you not understood from the foundations of the earth? Isaiah 40:21

Do you bring out the constellations (Mazzoroth) in its season? Or do you lead the Bear with its sons. Job 38:32

The CIRCLE in Isaiah 40:22 is the Mazzoroth in the sky above, that has 12 constellations in a circle on the ecliptic, which declare the Gospel. It is like a curtain which covers the earth, and in which the stars dwell.

The circle of Isaiah 40:22 is the ecliptic, not the flat earth circle

We see that Elohim tells them to look up to the celestial sphere (circle) of the stars of the Mazzoroth.

Lift up your eyes on high and see. Who has created these? He who is bringing out their host by number, He calls them all by name, by the greatness of His might and the strength of His power – not one is missing. Isaiah 40:26

He appoints the number of the stars, He gives names to all of them.” Psalm 147:4

So one can clearly see that when Elohim referred to the circle of the Earth, He is referring to the circle of the Mazzoroth which acts as a constant witness to those on earth, about His great power, and about His redemption plan.

The same Hebrew word, chuwg, is used in Job 22:14 to describe the circuit of heaven. “Thick clouds are a covering to him, that he seeth not; and he walketh in the circuit (chuwg) of heaven.”

Stop manipulating the Word of Elohim!  Read Biblical Proofs Of The Flat Earth Deception.

One of the most misleading things that proponents of the flat earth say is to ‘use your perspective as proof‘.

The challenge is that we are a small human on a large earth, so our perception is distorted.

We can only see so wide and far, so staring at a horizon that is only a few miles wide, we cannot see the curvature.

Flatearthers posts pictures from airplanes which seem to have a straight horizon, but when you put a line across the photo, you can see the curvature. In this image you can see the line is level with the horizon at the airplane pillar, and that there is a gap on the left and right side.

Airline pilot photo shows the curved earth

On this picture the red line is level on the left side, but you can clearly see the gap on the right side.

Airline pilot photo shows the curved earth 3

On this picture the red line is even on the sides, and you can see the curve of the earth in the center.

Supposed flat earth airplane image

Flatearthers counter by claiming that airplanes have curved glass that distorts the horizon.
Do you really think that airplanes would have glass in the cockpit that distorts the pilots view?
Does the windshield in your car cause the horizon to curve?  No!


Flat-earthers push aside the witness and photos of countless astronomers throughout the years and around the world, who have taken pictures of the planets and distant galaxies.

They proclaim that there are no real planets, and that they are just projections or lights.

There are astronomy clubs at many schools and astronomy groups in most major cities, who take pictures of the moon, stars, planets and distant galaxies. There is just no way that all of that is a conspiracy to hide the flat earth theory.

You can buy phone apps that show you where to look in the sky for planets, so that you know where to look with your optical telescope.

You can visit astronomy clubs and they will let you look through their optical telescopes, to see the planets and distance galaxies for yourself.  There is simply no excuse for this laziness!

Read Astronomy Proves The Flat Earth Deception.

Flat earthers push aside the witness of people who work in companies that use satellites.

They proclaim that there are no satellites, but that everything is done through cables or ground-based antennas.

Meteorologists around the world use satellites to show storms like hurricanes.

Hughes Satellite internet service can’t work with cables or land-based antennas, as the locations that receive the signals are too remote.

Navstar GPS works in remote areas through satellites.

Look at a house with the Dish Network, Echostar, DirectTV. What direction is the dish pointed to? The sky!!!

Look at a remote-location TV news crew, where is their dish pointed to?  The sky!

Sirius radio provides signals to you when you are far away from ground based antennas

Look at remote military units and military facilities to see where their dishes are pointed to.  The sky!

To deny satellites is to deny the existence of a space program covering the US, EU, Russia, China, India, Brazil, employing tens of millions of people and spending tens of billions of dollars a year, putting satellites in orbit, sending probes everywhere, creating the GPS system, satellite TV, etc.

It would mean that all of that is faked, on an ongoing basis, and none of these tens of millions of people has ever exposed the lie.

Read Satellites Prove The Flat Earth Deception.

They push aside the many people who have been to Antarctica as a researcher or tourist.

Flat earthers proclaim that the ice ring is protected so that nobody can see the end of the flat earth.

But that is ludicrous as people visit every year for research and for tourism.

Read Antarctica Proves The Flat Earth Deception

So why is the flat earth a topic these days? 

More and more people on Facebook and YouTube are promoting the flat earth theory, with ridiculous explanations that prove nothing.

Many of these people expose other conspiracies that have been foisted upon us; and they expose the truth about the Father and Son’s true names, about the Holy Feast Days, corrupt Bibles, etc.

So I believe that the enemy is getting them to believe in the flat-earth theory, so that others will discount all that they are proclaiming. It’s called a PSYOP, a Psychological Operation.

I think that flat-earthers are going to make everyone so tired of hearing about it, that people will not seek any of the truths that they share.  Many of them opening condemn everyone who doesn’t believe it, calling them fools and globeheads.

The story that Christians believed in a flat earth until Columbus’ time, and for some time thereafter, began as part of a fictional story that was elevated to historical fact by late 19th-century Darwinists who used it primarily as a means to ridicule Christians.

Sadly that appears to be happening again, as truthers who proclaim the flat earth are being ridiculed.

I hope that this page has helped to open your eyes to the truth, that the earth is a globe.

If you have some insight to prove that what I have shown is not correct, please comment below.

If you just want to make statements, without any proof; or if you just want to make accusations against me; then your comment may not be added to the discussion.

David Nikao

p.s. My explanations are logical, and are based on what we can see.  I don’t offer scientific explanations, because that is not my strength.

Sadly, I see flat earthers mocking scientific explanations about the globe earth, but giving really unscientific answers.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

{ 24 comments… read them below or add one }

Chris Burgin February 13, 2020 at 11:41 pm

this prayer is bunk, and so is the globe. you have done nothing but expose truth in your failed attempt to destry someones real facts. and this prayer at the bottom of this site is BUNK this is senseless worldy fake godliness at best. Sad to it it honestly.
I REBUKE THESE WORDS YOU PUKE ONTO THE INTERNET Yahuah, I pray that you bind Satan, his demons and his spirits, and cast them away from this website, and from the visitors of this website. I pray that you grant the visitors of this website eye salve, to see the truth, that they would repent and be your witnesses! I pray this in the name of Yahusha Messiah.


David February 14, 2020 at 12:47 am

Yes Chris, Jesus Christ of Nazareth is the King of Kings! But His disciples did not call Him by an English name, they called Him by His Hebrew name. The Father gave His name to the Israelites as the tetragrammaton, YHUH; but they rebelled and refused to use it anymore. And the enemy has hidden it for many years, but the Dead Sea Scrolls prove it out.

As for the earth, every day we see the sun and moon travel from the eastern horizon to the western horizon, and they stay the same size the whole time. That’s not possible if the earth was flat, for they would appear as a small dot on the eastern horizon, grow dynamically in size until they are overhead, and then they would shrink back down to a small dot.

Your belief about the flat earth is bunk, and all you’re doing is hiding the truth, that the universe is geocentric, and that the earth is at the center of it, proving that there’s a Creator. Instead, you’re acting a fool, proclaiming that it’s flat.


Rihards January 21, 2020 at 11:17 pm

Thank you for portraying the truth about a spherical land. It’s similar to what I was thinking before finding your website.
True traditional Catholicism is the only way that can provide salvation. But unfortunately, many have fallen into the trap of flat-Earth deception promoted by globalists and Illuminati. Perhaps a misunderstanding of the physical world would not be decisive in salvation, but this is what undoubtedly divide remnant Catholics and society in general.


David January 21, 2020 at 11:49 pm

Thank you for your comment about the flat earth. That said, Mary is not the intercessor to the Father and she is not necessary for salvation. Those beliefs are contrary to Scripture.

God proclaims that there is only One who had no sin, His beloved Son, the Lord Jesus.

“For we do not have a High Priest who cannot sympathize with our weaknesses, but was in all points tempted as we are, yet without sin.” Hebrews 4:15

God offered His Beloved Son as a sacrifice for our sins, that we might have His righteousness.

“For He made Him who knew no sin to be sin for us, that we might become the righteousness of God in Him.” 2 Corinthians 5:21

God proclaims that salvation is only through His beloved Son; not through Mary or the Pope.

The Bible says, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me.” John 14:6

God proclaims that salvation cannot be found any other way.

The Bible says, “Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved.” Acts 4:12

God proclaims that salvation is by faith in Christ, not by works.

The Bible says, “For by grace you have been saved through faith, and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God, not of works, lest anyone should boast.”
Ephesians 2:8-9

God proclaims that there is only one Mediator between man and Him, the Lord Christ Jesus; not Mary or the Pope.

“For there is one God and one Mediator between God and men, the Man Christ Jesus, who gave Himself a ransom for all.” 1 Timothy 2:5-6

The Bible says that Jesus is our Advocate and never says that Mary fills this role.

“My little children, these things I write to you, so that you may not sin. And if anyone sins, we have an Advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous.” 1 John 2:1

The Bible says the Jesus is our Redeemer and never says that Mary fills this role.

Jesus never elevated Mary for worship; He praised those who hear and obey the Word of God.

“And it happened, as He spoke these things, that a certain woman from the crowd raised her voice and said to Him, “Blessed is the womb that bore You, and the breasts which nursed You!” But He said, “More than that, blessed are those who hear the word of God and keep it!”
Luke 11:27-28

“Then His mother and brothers came to Him, and could not approach Him because of the crowd. And it was told Him by some, who said, “Your mother and Your brothers are standing outside, desiring to see You.” But He answered and said to them, “My mother and My brothers are these who hear the word of God and do it.”
Luke 8:19-21

I pray that you will follow Scriptural truth and not the teachings of men.


KVN December 29, 2019 at 7:38 am

David, Something to consider concerning that the Earth is not spinning, I believe it is and proof of that is why the moon always sets in the west, but it travels East.

I live in Colorado and at new moon time it is west of Colorado appearing above and beyond the Mountains in the west and it takes an hour or so to set. On the next night it is higher in the Sky but still in the west and it might take 2 hours to set again in the west. On the 3rd night it might now be high enough in the sky to be over Colorado now and it sets again in the west, but now it might take 3 hours to set. What I am pointing out is that the moon travels East around the earth and in about two weeks time from being a new moon in the East it continues to travel to the furthest East until it is full, but because the moon continues to set every night in the West shows that the earth is spinning.

We can’t be fooled by the flat earthers when they show something like a tire spinning at only 100 or so miles per hour, which shows that at that speed alone it would be hard for everything not to fly off because of it spinning, and then they tell us to imagine if it were actually spinning at 1000 miles an hour. WOW, right? However, this does not depict the spin of the earth, at all.

In order to properly depict the spin of the earth then the spin has to be sized down to the size of the object. Naturally, something 1000 times smaller than the earth but spinning as fast as the earth is not equal. To make an equal comparison of the speed that the earth is spinning the speed of the object spinning would have to take 24 hours to make one complete turn. In other words, even if the object spun as fast as the hour hand on a clock that would be spinning two times faster that the earth is spinning because the hour hand on the clock goes around the clock two times in a 24 hour period of time. However, if the hour hand of that clock were extended out as far as the earth’s furthest point, which would be something like 1200 miles out, then at the end of the hour hand it would be moving at about 1200 miles an hour. At the end of the hand it would be moving that fast but near to where the hand begins you couldn’t even detect it is moving.


David December 30, 2019 at 3:55 am

Thank you for your comment. I’m not seeing how the moon moving from east to west, proves that the earth is spinning.

The Michelson-Morley and Airy’s Failure experiments proved that the earth is not moving.


GlobeKrusha January 19, 2020 at 1:28 pm

These effing Jesuit philosophers should be canned for their disservice to man. We got a big fight on our hands with these frigging shills that cannot even address their obvious flaws, they refuse to state. Ever noticed the grammar of a FEr, is somewhat more superior than their counterparts?


David January 19, 2020 at 2:53 pm

I agree that the Jesuits should be canned for their disservice to man! Yeah, the shills in the FE discussion cannot even address their obvious flaws. As for the grammar of FE’s being superior to there counterparts, that ain’t true, your just making that up! 😛


Graham November 23, 2019 at 3:11 pm

I think men and woman have been the target of disinformation since the earliest of times..i will present an observation for consideration .this happened to me whilst hiking early one morning in early summer in Belfast Ireland which has a hill called Black Mountain on its western side.on top of the mountain is a 900ft TV transmitter so the tip of this transmitter is nearly 2k in the air. it was a beautifully stunning clear morning a cloudless sky [which is extremely rare in these parts] the sun was not visible from my perspective which was approx 500ft above sea level the sky was lit but i knew the sun would soon be visible . I had a pair of very powerful binoculars with me and i looked to see if there was direct sunlight on the white paneling at the top of the TV transmitter which is remember 2k above sea level………. there was no direct sunlight at the tip of the transmitter …….. from my vantage point a high-flying plane came into view flying from the west I would estimate it was 10 miles to my west [probably an early transatlantic flight on route to UK or European airport] the plane was probably at 36,000 feet it was obvious even with naked eye that the entire plane was in full direct sunlight illumination …i check this with my binoculars and could validate the plane was fully illuminated could even make out the AA livery on the plane….i quickly checked the TV transmitter again and could see there was no direct sunlight on the TV Tower… here is the 64 million dollar question ………. how could an object which is further west be illuminated than a object like say the TV tower ??? if curvature is not allowed as in FE models ……….ps some minutes later i seen the sunrise way to the east and the TV tower was now in full illumination ………..could this set of circumstances be possible on a FE? I would be interested on anyone’s thoughts on this manner ?


David November 23, 2019 at 3:58 pm

That’s an interesting scenario Graham, we’ll see if anyone has an explanation.

That said, all we have to do is observe the sun and moon, to know that the earth is curved; for they both stay the same size as they travel from the eastern horizon to the western horizon, which is not possible of the earth were flat.

If the earth were flat, they would appear as a small dot on the eastern horizon, then grow dynamically in size until they’re overhead, and then shrink down to a little dot on the western horizon. But that is not what we see. Simple as that!


Gemma November 23, 2019 at 10:32 am
David November 23, 2019 at 2:18 pm

I’m not really sure what you’re referring to, about your comment being spam.


peter edwards November 21, 2019 at 9:47 pm

A simple observation I have carried out for two years and about to repeat this year isDone with only an accurate watch and a dog to take for a walk. My My latitude i almost exactly 50 degrees North, degree West . I take my dog for a walk most evenings along the coast and record the time of the sun set. I note that the earliest sunset occurs well ahead of the winter solstice. The earliest sunrise occurs well after the the winter solstice. On a FE one would expect the solstice be the date ob both these observations. The only way that I can account for this phenomena is that the Earth is following an elliptical orbit about the sun and that the solstice is near the perihelion. Hence indicitive of a Heliocentric model. Hope this adds more to the body of knowledge that disproves the FE.


David November 22, 2019 at 1:28 am

Thank you for sharing your insight Peter! Sadly, most flat-earthers will just dismiss proofs like this, because the earth seems flat to them.


Robot November 15, 2019 at 4:23 am

The 2 bucket question is about the dumbest question I have ever read. 2 gaskins of water is more than 1 gallon, so obviously more of one thing will out weigh the lesser. Why? Because up is up and down is down and it is simple as that. On a flat surface the “above” is what is exactly that. On this fake round earth “above” becomes a paradox to the relative position. Why does every anti flat earth idiot try to ignore the infinite plane theory and only try to attack the stupid Christian maybe based theory it’s all a small prison? Because infinite plane is even harder to disprove as all very real physical video evidence with a nonfisheye lens camera shows that once it goes higher and higher the earth never reveals a curve, but an infinite flat plane extending forever in any direction. Alien life is earth life. Why would they lie? More like why DO they lie because it happens. Why do people believe in christianity or the other ridiculous diety based religions? Because it has been an agreed upon lie for millions. Science has just as much to lose by going back on saying our planet is a ball that by some miracle doesnt collide with it’s own satellites artificial or the moon and that it stays perfectly in the same spot around the sun for billions of years without it falling from the push of the sun or getting pulled into it or it falling completely from orbit altogether since it is suppose to be in a free fall anyhow. The dumbest thing is gravity. Spin a ball at mach 1 and anything on it comes flying off. Why doesnt it’s own gravitational force keep small objects on it? Or keep it from exiting its “atmosphere”? Surely in scale to how massive the sun is suppose to be and its location a basketball and earth wouldn’t have to compete so much as earth and the sun do. So the day you can stand a piece of rice on the side of a basketball and spin it to mach 1 and it sticks to that ball is the day I’ll fucking believe this is a round earth. How does air become colder as it gets closer to the sun? And it is suppose to be what protects us from its intense rays? How is it UV light hits a very thin sheet of plastic and greatly heats anything after it but the earths thin layer of atmosphere prevents overheating? The greenhouse effect works in a closed model, it has never worked in an open air model. The earth would have to have an up and a down that isn’t relative to a single point but all points for stationary non living things to go “down” without action from an outside source.


David November 15, 2019 at 2:50 pm

Well Robot, I understand why you’re a flat-earther. The density of the water is the same, and buoyancy of water is not a factor. Those are the two properties that flat-earthers cite, as the reason that things are attracted to the earth. You can add electromagnetism, but water isn’t magnetic. So why would 2 gallons of water be drawn to the earth at a greater rate than 1 gallon of water, given the principles that flat-earthers cite?

Saying that up is up and down is down, doesn’t explain the force. Why do you think that ‘up’ has one direction in space?

As for your arguments about a spinning earth, if you paid any attention to this website, you would know that I believe that the globe earth is not moving or spinning; but it’s immovable at the center of the universe.

Your pseudo-scientific arguments aren’t worth debating. Your biggest problem is that you don’t believe in a deity that created the earth, which is absurd. Everything around you screams that there’s a Creator; your body, the animal kingdom, the many food plants which feed the animals, etc, etc, etc.


Jeremy November 7, 2019 at 4:08 am

Thank you for all of your research, wisdom, and patience with so many negative people who only seem to want to live as contrarians. I truly believe that if the rest of the world came out tomorrow and agreed that the world was flat the whole lot of these “flat earthers” would change their tune and start calling everyone else stupid as they now know the world to be a globe. Furthermore, and most importantly, thank you for your strong faith and convictions! I will continue to pray for you and the for the work that you do. God bless!


David November 7, 2019 at 4:33 am

Thank you for your comment Jeremy! People want to feel special, like they have secret knowledge, and the flat-earth theory let’s them do that. All we can do is share the truth, and pray that the Spirit helps people see through the deception. God bless!


Simon Russell October 11, 2019 at 6:09 am

How do you explain the Abu Dubai to Texas flight that appears as a straight line on the flat earth map? How do you explain the flight routes from Sydney to joanasburg via Dubai that fly in a ridiculous triangle on the globe map? How do you explain the supposed non existant flights that go over Antarctica?


David October 11, 2019 at 2:33 pm

Simon, the explanations on that page are not using a globe to represent the flight path, it’s using a Mercator 2D map that displays the countries side-by-side; so of course the flights don’t make sense. The irony is that the north-polar azimuthal equidistant projection, which people call a flat-earth map; is really a 2D globe map that was used to map out flights; so of course the map works properly.

The Maps Prove The Flat Earth Deception page clearly shows that what’s called a flat-earth map is a 2D globe map.

So in effect, that article is using a globe map to prove that flights work properly, and proclaiming that it works on the flat earth; and they are misrepresenting the globe with a distorted Mercator map, and saying that the flights don’t work on the globe. Such trickery!

The Maps Prove The Flat Earth Deception page has a link to the e-chalk tool, which allows you to map out those same flights on a globe; to see how they work, just like they do on the 2D north-polar azimuthal equidistant projection globe map.


Simon Russell October 11, 2019 at 6:47 pm

I can see that gives a valid explanation for the first 2, but it doesn’t explain why a flight from Perth Australia to joanasburg would have a refueling stop in Abu Dubai on the globe map, effectively going up just to come down again, effectively decreasing the efficiency of the route if that is the true route. Do you have any evidence of flights over Antarctica or is the claim true in stating they don’t exist?



David October 11, 2019 at 7:00 pm

I cover southern flights on the Flights Prove The Flat Earth Deception page.

Here’s a link to FlightAware that shows nonstop flights that go from Australia to South Africa

Here’s a current nonstop flight from Perth to Johannesburg

There’s no reason for that flight to go over Antarctica, as that would be a longer trip.


Ian October 8, 2019 at 9:52 am

You don’t understand… earth is a em torus field… it looks actually flat… but is curved …
Until you acknowledge and understand the flatness hard to make progress
Have some good points but mostly you don’t understand the flatness

There is a lot of disinformation out there as you correctly point out however
Both are an illusion
Spinning globe is thought illusion…flat earth is illusion of the plane we live on which behaves like a sphere … but looks flat to us… if we lived on a globe of circumference with 24900 miles our horizon would look totally different… not only on land… and into the distance… but also 300 000 feet above ground… there’s lots more to understand… we experience and sense only small shadow of the light… higher dimensional structure we cannot yet comprehend. … What’s very obvious though… is the flat ness of water and land everywhere and the level horizon… I encourage you to wake up from your own illusions and continue the thinking process invite you to the reality where both is possible 🙂 flat square fractal 3torus


David October 8, 2019 at 2:59 pm

I understand that what people see matches up with the earth curvature formula. Whether from the shore of the ocean or from 100,000 feet; the distance to the horizon line matches up with the earth curvature formula. If the earth were flat, we would be able to see much further.

I understand that the sun and the moon are faithful witnesses of a globe earth, as they appear the same size all the way across the sky, and the rise up from below the horizon and set below the horizon. It’s not rocket science. 😛

As for the ‘flatness’ of water, that’s deception. We can see ships sail away and disappear bottom first, proving that the curved earth is hiding the ships. You’re the one who needs to wake up from your illusions.


Leave a Comment