This website exposes the flat earth deception and proves that the earth is globe shaped.
This page discusses photos in regard to the flat earth deception, and the globe earth proof.
It’s been established that much of what NASA publishes is CGI to provide clear images; and there is much controversy about the lunar landing, the Challenger space shuttle accident, etc.; so this website does not cite NASA.
To be fair, the same is true of images that are provided by flat earthers, who are biased and have an agenda. So we will rely on third-parties, who have no agenda in regard to the flat earth debate, but only love astronomy.
We know that NASA was created by PSYOP specialists, mind-control people. We know that they did not land on the moon, and that the video and photos were faked.
But that in itself does not prove the flat earth.
Flat earthers continually post images on Facebook that are not wide enough to prove that the earth is flat. They are 1-2 miles wide, which is not going to show a perceivable curve.
Where are the pictures from high above the earth, that prove that the earth looks like the flat earth map?
Where are the pictures of the supposed glass dome?
Where are the pictures of the edge of the flat earth?
Please show me photos that prove these things; and then I will comment about them.
Until then it’s just a theory.
The High Altitude Balloon 18 video, which was published on Jan 7, 2019; shows the curvature of the earth.
This video was recorded by the camera with the 1000nm infrared filter and a 7.2mm lens. The comparison video was shot with a camera placed next to it in the capsule. That camera had a 5.4mm lens. The infrared camera has a tighter shot than the comparison camera.
These still shots from the video show the curvature.
They use photos that seem like the horizon is straight, but if you simply put a straight line across them, you see the curvature.
On this photo over the U.K., the white line is level with the horizon in the middle left, and there is obvious curvature on both the left and right side.
On this one the red line is level with the horizon to the right of the airplane support beam, and the left and right side of the horizon curved down.
On this one the red line is even with the horizon on the left and right sides, and the earth is raised up in the middle, proving that the earth is curved.
On this one the red line is level on the left side and on the right side the horizon drops down.
Flat Earthers pictures confirmed the curvature formula!
Below are pictures which give the altitude of the airplane, so that we can plug that number into the curvature formula, to determine the horizon line; to see if it matches up with the picture.
These pictures were taken from a U2 spy plane by the manufacturer, Lockheed, at 70,000 feet. The curvature formula says that the horizon line is 324 miles; and that it what the picture shows us, proving that the earth is curved.
From 70,000 feet, if the Earth were flat, we should be able to see much, much further.
This picture was taken on a Gulfstream jet at 45,000 feet, so the curvature formula says that the horizon line is 260 miles; and that it what the picture shows us, proving that the earth is curved. On a flat earth, we should be able to see much further at 45,000 feet (8.5 miles) up.
This photo was taken at 40,000 feet, so the curvature formula says that the horizon line is 245 miles, which looking at the land below, looks on target, proving that the Earth is curved.
This photo was taken at 30,000 feet, so the curvature formula says that the horizon line is 212 miles, which looking at the land below, looks on target, proving that the Earth is curved.
This photo was taken at 750 feet, so the curvature formula says that the horizon line is 33.54 miles, which looking at the horizon, looks on target, proving that the Earth is curved.
Here is the only picture ever taken of Concorde flying at Mach 2 (1,350 mph). Taken from an RAF Tornado fighter jet, which only rendezvoused with Concorde for 4 minutes over the Irish Sea: The Tornado was rapidly running out of fuel, struggling to keep up with Concorde at Mach 2. Notice that the plane is straight, which proves that a fish-eye lens is not distorting the picture.
Flat earthers proclaim that the plane is curved, so they proclaim that a fish-eye lens was used (which is their standard response about any photo which shows the curve); so I added a straight line below the line of windows, so that you can see that it’s straight.
Below is a photo by Captain Mike Bannister showing the curvature of the earth as seen from a Concorde flight.
Return to the Flat Earth Deception home page.
Respectfully, this website is a waste of energy.
Most of it proves FE.
It proves that the earth is a globe which is at the center of the universe. https://biblicalgeocentrism.com
When Earth needs to be evacuated, I say EVERY flat earther needs to stay. There is ZERO room for stupidity alongside the greater of mankind.
Also, physics was evolved around round objects in a vacuum that orbit a star because of gravitational mass. So, when you try and disprove a global earth, you’ll need to come up with you’re own laws and leave ours out of your equation. Not a single law of physics can help you prove a flat earth. It’s contradictory.
You try so hard to believe in a pipe dream of a flat earth and a big lie when in reality, you just look extremely uneducated and make the rest of us look bad.
The earth is not flat, boats disappear bottom up when crossing the horizon, we spin 1000mph and orbit a star that is 93,000,000 miles away.
If you don’t believe that, ONE question.
When you are on a plane, why doesn’t the sun and moon get larger since you’re 30,000 feet off the ground? According to you peoples “model” (which no one has ever seen) the sun and moon are local which means 30,000 feet from the surface, the sun and moon should be MASSIVE. I want pictures showing this, then I’ll be a flat earther. You’ll never get picture
You refuse to believe your own eyes, you`re a joke. NASA admits they are lying, they literally tell you that they can`t leave Low Earth Orbit. Buzz Aldrin literally tells you they never went the Moon. Hillary Clinton & Trump literally tell you, glass ceiling & no curvature. Some of the pics you posted literally show you no curvature & the pics with curve are through a fisheye camera lens.
Buzz Aldrins never said that. You can see the equipment and footprints left behind on the moon. And he took a dandy picture of the globe from there.
Who’s paying you is all I need to know sir???
Alan, nobody needs to pay me to show how the Bible describes a globe earth that sits immovable at the center of the universe. Do you think that the evil ones who promote the heliocentric universe and evolution want me proclaiming these things? https://biblicalgeocentrism.com
But the earth according to science isn’t immovable. It spins on it’s axis. Then on top of that it spins around the moon and then the whole universe is spinning.
The mainstream, controlled scientific community is misleading people.
The Michelson-Morley Experiment confirmed that the Earth is motionless.
Cosmic microwaves show that the Earth is in the center of the universe. The radiation data shows that the whole universe is divided into two, with a northern hemisphere and a southern hemisphere; all of which lines up with the Earth’s equator.
There’s more information on this page: https://flatearthdeception.com/the-hidden-option-of-the-geocentric-globe-earth/
What the Michelson-Morley experiment did was divert attention away from discovery about the aether being dark matter. Their work also supported more lies by fellow liar cabalist named Einstein, another mason son-of-a-Semiramis. Brother Albert became a member of Washington Lodge No.21 New York City in 1875. No info on Morley, but it only takes one mason to spoil anything.
No it doesn’t. It proves that aether does not move with a different relative velocity to the earth. Why? Because aether doesn’t exist. That’s what the Michelsen Morley experiment proved.
There is plenty of empirical proof that the earth rotates on its own axis and revolves around the sun.
If you have a focault pendulum and/or a gyroscope, you’ll see that that it will rotate because the earth isn’t stationary.
Some of the information you’re putting out as fact is actually not fact. It’s kind of funny how do people actually notice they’re being lied to some refuse to believe it can you tell me why when something disappears over the horizon such as the sun even when it completely disappears you can keep focusing in with an 80 time camera and the sun reappears over and over again never going over the horizon. Also the light that beans down from the sun, our sun beams come down at Angles. If the sun really were 90 million miles away and we were rotating around it the light sunbeams would be straight down no matter how the cloud mess with the lighting they would go down not at an angle. you choose only to believe what you have heard over and over again what you have been shown over and over again try to disprove The horizon effect try to disprove the light Sunbeam angle effect. Just like you guys say facts are facts physics is physics to disprove my physics. What’s really going on is were in a super bowl and were the slaves in the system and we are unaware that there are a different type of people surrounding what we consider to be the Earth what is the land mass of massive amounts of land look up admiral Byrd he was one of the only ones to fly over the ice wall and see it. No matter what deception it’s hard to find and easily believed and all I know is if I have any inkling of an idea that I am being lied to about Earth God in life I want to know.
Greg, please show me a video where the sun goes down and then someone is able to zoom in to see it reappear over and over.
As for the earth rotating around the sun, try actually reading what I say on the home page, as I believe in the geocentric universe.
Every lens provides distortion of some type. This is further compounded by the fact that the wider angle the lens, the more curvature distortion and people tend to use wide angle lenses to capture dramatic photos from altitude. Unless the distortion of the lens has been documented and the distortion factored out, or unless the picture was taken with what is known as a “flat field” lens no picture is proof of anything. BTW, I do not necessarily subscribe to the flat earth theory, I am just saying that cameras have distortion and unless this is taken into account, no photo can be used as proof of earth curvature.
Thank you Chris for sharing your insight. If photos don’t prove that the earth is curved, then they don’t prove that the earth is flat either, unless the distortion of the lens has been documented and the distortion factored out.
I haven’t anything to add on these “scientific” discussions, only to state the following, which I think needs to be stated. Senses and data are fallible, and scientific theories even more so; they may be interesting to consider, but at this juncture it seems they devolve into weapons of slander and division. It may be impossible to know the truth incontrovertibly given our human limitations. This entire quest to obtain a knowledge of the heavenly through our means of observation might have had a purpose at some point that was practical: the prediction of harvest seasons, weather, the creation of some forms of useful communication. But now?
This is going to be the final thing I ever look at in terms of this issue. Supposing the world is round – and that it is even possible to “get off of it” via rockets to some extraterrestrial location – which seems to be the aim of the space program – is this a goal, at the end of the day, that Christ espoused? Did God say we are to follow Him by expensively shooting ourselves off the planet to “boldly go where no man has gone before”? Was the tower of Babel a wonderful exercise that should be repeated – this time with rockets? How will it stand on the Day of Judgement with a ton of poor people languishing in poverty that intelligent people who could have otherwise helped them involved themselves in awful and slanderous arguments, in greater and greater division – or worse, on the contrary, greater and greater investment in idle pursuits?
How is this bringing us any closer to the sort of service Christ asked us to have – the sort of characteristics that renders us to be “sheep” and not “goats” at the Day of Judgement. How does it help us to visit the sick, tend to the poor, show brotherly compassion right here on Earth? How does it produce fruit of the spirit?
I can see that there could be some benefit in exposing the fact that the Earth is stationary to the end that it would bolster the faith of Christians, and return people to a God-oriented mentality. But beyond this? Beyond the dismantling of enormous investments in child-like pursuits, what is the point?
At the drop of a hat, any of our scientific theories could prove groundless. Is the point therefore to create “better scientific theories”? When God did His miracles, did he necessitate some special understanding on the part of Moses? Does He require us to know the exact shape of the Earth; will we acquire heaven by the understanding of whether it’s gravity or electromagnetism that holds the water in place?
Does anything in our day to day lives depend upon this?
Do we need to understand this to get to a higher place of operating effectively for Christ?
As difficult as it is for a curious being to “want to know” the truth, and who exactly lied to it in a universe of more and more elaborate lies and counter lies – maybe the most mature thing is to just simply give up trying to obtain it. Job was righteous and he didn’t probably know any great thing about physics. The thief on the cross – did he have some special knowledge?
What will God say about this usage of time.
So scandalously I might have been lied to in a time when the world is under the grip of a liar. So be it.
I will not give to that more of my time and interest. For it really won’t matter if I knew the exact circuit of the sun, if I neglected to do the higher things that Christ said were of first priority.
If the entire point of this argument is to know the Truth, I think it would be best to put it most forcibly in the front – with the priorities of God being first: charity, meekness, right application of wealth.
If all goes well the next being to tell me what the shape of the universe was won’t be a fallible human, but God Himself.
And if it goes poorly, it will be no comfort to me in hell that I know the circuit of Mars.
This comment was the best thing I read here. Thank you.